He and his attorney told Angie and her attorney that the alimony in his offer is non-taxable. Angie would get to keep the entire lump sum and none of it would be taxable. Great. Angie considered the lump sum in relation to her cash needs. Looks good.

But, when the agreement was typed up for signatures, it said that Angie was getting her lump sum alimony money from Herman’s IRA account. Herman was going to transfer that IRA money to Angie. He was not going to withdraw it, pay the income tax due and then hand it to Angie. That meant Angie would have to pay income taxes on her alimony when she withdraws it from the IRA.  When I point this out to her, she and her attorney are no longer happy.

Surprises are not fun in divorce proceedings. Angie and her attorney started packing their stuff, ready to walk out.

I sat down with Herman and his attorney to try to figure out how he could give Angie a lump sum that will not be taxable to her. After all, he had offered that to her.

He didn’t want to part with any of his cash-in-bank. So, we scoured his IRA and discovered that it included a large chunk of post-tax contributions. This meant that Herman could use the post-tax contribution money for the lump sum alimony. Angie would not have to pay income tax on the alimony money she withdraws from the IRA. Angie and her attorney were back to happy.

Income taxes are hidden in all kinds of places. Be careful.

Of course, they could not agree on how to divide their property. They had a modest income, a modest house, very little cash, some credit card debt and a couple of retirement accounts. Had they worked collaboratively and with the assistance of a CPA who understands the nuances of divorce financial issues, they could have divided their property in a way that would have achieved both their goals.

This couple eventually ended up in front of a judge, having spent all their cash on their divorce attorneys and even further under credit card debt. The judge divided the property and debts in a manner that he, no doubt, felt was fair and equitable. Unfortunately, is was not financially wise nor was it creative.

This judge divided the property and debts in an overall 60/40 split, with the greater share going to the wife. The husband was granted the home and ordered to pay the wife for her share of the home … with cash and pretty darned quickly, too. His Honor did not inquire as to how the husband was going to get his hands on this $60,000 of cash. He did not inquire as to whether the husband will qualify for a refinance mortgage. Perhaps he did not care. Perhaps he was tired of settling marital disputes for angry, emotional couples who foolishly refuse to talk to one another.

If the husband cannot qualify for a refinance mortgage, he will retain the existing mortgage and the ex- wife’s name will remain on that mortgage obligation. She may be unable to buy a home for herself. Her credit will be tethered to that of her ex-husband as long as her name is still on that mortgage. What mortgage company will wish to give this woman (with a very modest income) a mortgage when she already has one? Furthermore, the husband will have to cash out a sizable portion of his retirement to pay off the wife, incurring unnecessary and avoidable income taxes and penalties.

To me, this is a sad story. This financial debacle was avoidable with collaborative efforts and the aid of a CPA with financial planning expertise, such as a PFS designation. Particular knowledge in divorce issues is a plus. If you are contemplating divorce or in the midst of divorce, stay out of the courtroom. If for no other reason, do it for your own financial security.

In order for this to work, the alimony must qualify as alimony.

The payments must be in cash, checks or money orders. If payments are to a third party (stated to be such in the divorce decree), the payments can be considered alimony if they otherwise qualify for alimony.

Payments must be required by the decree or separation agreement.

The decree cannot designate the alimony payments as “not alimony”.

Spouses can not be members of the same household (much as they may want to be).

Alimony payments cannot be treated as child support.

Alimony payor is not liable to make payments after the recipient’s death.

Payor and recipient cannot file a joint tax return.

According to the Internal Revenue Code, you don’t recognize a gain or loss on a transfer between spouses or to a former spouse incident to divorce. But you need to know the definition of “incident to divorce”.

A property transfer is “incident to divorce” if it….

1. Occurs within one year after the divorce or
2. It is made pursuant to a divorce or separation agreement and occurs within six years after the date the marriage ends.

Thus, get the property transfers into the decree and get them done within less than six years.